Quantcast

Trump Regularly Claims Extreme Media Persecution - Now, A Harvard Study Might Back That Up

President Donald Trump has made no secret of the fact that he feels the media is unfairly slanted against him, and that’s become a rallying cry of sorts for his supporters as well. Critics and detractors scoff at that notion and view the coverage as perfectly suitable. As the Independent Journal Review shares, a new study from Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy gives plenty of weight to Trump’s argument, and it also reveals that the other camp doesn’t have a leg to stand on when they attempt to dismiss his claims as unfounded.

Trump has been subjected to negative stories since the time he announced he was running for office. The intensity of the coverage ebbs and flows based on which way the wind is blowing, but the negativity has reached an all-time high in recent weeks. An endless slew of stories have been making the rounds based on anonymous sources and unsubstantiated claims, but the vast majority of the media has reported them as facts that are beyond a shadow of a doubt. It’s gotten so bad that Trump took to social media to respond.

“This is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!” he wrote.

Detractors scoffed at the notion, but the new study shows there’s plenty of merit to Trump’s take. The study analyzed coverage of the Trump presidency on a number of major outlets, and the end result was full of shocking takeaways.

“Trump has received unsparing coverage for most weeks of his presidency, without a single major topic where Trump’s coverage, on balance, was more positive than negative, setting a new standard for unfavorable press coverage of a president,” the report reads in part.

According to some outlets, there’s a pretty much nothing positive to report whatsoever. That’s nearly impossible, but the way the coverage is presented will certainly make you think twice about it.

"Trump’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity ... it was negative even by the standards of today’s hyper-critical press,” noted Professor Thomas E. Patterson, of Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

There’s a whole bunch of food for thought on the pages of this report, and it provides further evidence that several media outlets are in the midst of a severe credibility crisis.

Source: Independent Journal Review
Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Tell Us What You Think

More News Stories

Hillary Clinton is not going to win next year’s presidential election simply because voters would like to see a woman in the White House,...

Daniel Chase, 53, of Alto Michigan checked his December 16 Powerball ticket just last week. It was sitting in his wallet for two months. What he...

A woman out on the Chicago streets spotted a sight that is, sadly, all too familiar. A homeless man sat shivering in a bus stop shelter wrapped in...

From the NFL to high school teams, more and more football games have become a platform to people to protest, or even disrespect, the national...

One poor horse in Indiana got herself into a pickle. She was trying to cross a railroad bridge, and her hooves got caught between the wooden ties...

Latest News Stories

Rand Paul’s fellow Republicans continue to criticize him for saying GOP “hawks” in Congress are responsible for the Islamic State militant group,...

Evangelical voters should not cast their ballots for Donald Trump because his “bigotry” violates biblical teachings, according to 75 leaders of...

Moon gazers, get ready - the supermoon is coming, and it's going to be an opportunity you won't get again for 17 years.

The next full moon...

Women should join young men in registering for a possible military draft, two U.S. generals said Tuesday.

Thomson/Reuters noted that the...

The dreaded ‘hot mic’ strikes again. This time, it’s not a future president of the United States that was engaged in some potty-mouthed talk, but...