Quantcast

De Niro Blasts Trump in Awards Speech Over His 'Bulls--t'

Taxpayer funding of the arts is a polarizing issue. As soon as President Donald Trump eliminated federal funding in his recent budget, actor Robert De Niro was quick to jump on a soapbox and disrespect the president.

De Niro has taken below-the-belt shots at Trump before. "He’s so blatantly stupid. He’s a punk. He’s a dog. He’s a pig. He’s a con, a bulls--t artist, a mutt who doesn’t know what he’s talking about, doesn’t do his homework, doesn’t care," he's said.

Now, the actor is furious that Trump's new budget proposal would cut National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting out of the budget.

“Everyone knows Chaplin was a great artist, but he made his movies to entertain. It was only later that they became art. I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately because of our government’s hostility towards art," De Niro explained as he accepted the Film Society of Lincoln Center’s 44th Chaplin Award for lifetime achievement. "...For their own devices and political purposes, the administration suggests that the money for these all-inclusive program goes to the rich, liberal elite. This is what they now call an alternative fact. I call it what it is — bullshit.”

De Niro seems to believe that public television depriving people of Dr. Who re-runs and artist who pee on crucifixes is 'mean-spirited' and 'unfair'. "All of us in film — directors, actors, writers, crews, audiences — owe a debt to Charlie Chaplin, an immigrant who probably wouldn’t pass today’s extreme vetting. I hope we’re not keeping out the next Chaplin.”

Many Hollywood A-listers and big wigs are as outraged as De Niro is about the pulling of public funding for the arts. Even with America's budget crisis, it's more important that elitist artists get the opportunity to show off animal poop sculptures than it is to get the country's finances under control again.

Lawmakers who support funding of the arts point out that it's no longer necessary to put that burden on the taxpayer. This is truer than ever in this day and age of social media and crowdfunding-- it lets people use their money to support the art they actually like, rather than putting that money into the hands of elitists to decide which art should be funded.

Source: Real Time Politics
Photo: 123RF, YouTube Screenshot

Tell Us What You Think

More News Stories

A mother who murdered her physically and mentally disabled son by leaving him out in a field to die of exposure pleaded guilty to involuntary man...

On Tuesday, those that tuned into the daily White House press briefing were treated to perhaps the most epic spectacle that has taken place in the...

A woman who recently criticized a mother for breastfeeding her baby at a town park in the United Kingdom got a surprising reaction.

The...

Lynn Craig returned home to Roanoke, Virginia, from Iraq in September 2005. Yet, his parents received a letter he sent them from Iraq 11 years ago...

A woman in Australia says a bunch of 'eight-legged freaks' are invading her home. No matter what she tried to do, they just 'kept coming' as they...

Latest News Stories

One Oklahoma restaurant is causing a stir after management hung a controversial sign in the window. The restaurant wanted to make it abundantly...

A Facebook video gone viral shows a wife catching her husband in the act. The Idaho woman set a trap for her husband when she suspected him of...

One Boston professor stood before a classroom full of students and admitted he longed to see President Donald Trump impeached. The professor then...

When you’re in the midst of investigating one of the most powerful women in the world, it’s probably a good idea to decline a meeting with an old...

Specialty dating websites are nothing new, but now people have become so politically divided there are apparently services just for those who...